plantigrade stance

cards tobaccoreviews.com
Current Stats:    tobaccos: 3881 (1 new)   /   reviews: 40275 (123 new)   /   Users Online : 463   /   full report > plantigrade


modified plantigrade positionplantigrade plantigrademodified plantigrade positionplantigradeplantigrademodified plantigrade positionplantigrade Hall of Fame
Search:
[advanced]
modified plantigrade position





plantigradeplantigrade


modified plantigrade position


plantigrade stancecats photo

centurion 5000 generator adjustments My Account
modified plantigrade position

modified plantigrade position


modified plantigrade position
Log In
Join Now

plantigrade stance cats

college  
My Account
Browse Tobaccos
Add Tobaccos
Add Brand
 
Connect

plantigrade stance pictures

alaba RSS
Facebook

modified plantigrade position

homemade birthday invitations Blog
 
Help
Contact
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
 


Welcome Recent News

plantigrade stance photo

   

Tobacco Reviews is the place on the internet to learn about and share your impressions of the panoply of pipe tobaccos in the world today.

From long-gone legends of pipe smoking to the newest cutting-edge blends, from the most obscure gems from boutique blenders to the most widely smoked tobaccos today, they are all here.

Thousands of your fellow smokers have written tens of thousands of reviews of all of these tobaccos, sharing their wisdom, wit and honest opinions. You are cordially invited to join the discussion and add your thoughts and reflections to our ever-increasing stock of collective knowledge on pipe tobacco.

Take a look around the database, see what others have written about your favorite pipe tobaccos, discover some new things to try out, and when you are ready, join us and let us know what you think of the tobaccos you have smoked.

Pipe smoking is a gentle hobby, and we strive to treat each other, and our differing opinions of pipe tobaccos with the respect and restraint due to the ladies and gentlemen that we are, or hope to be. Please help us to maintain this atmosphere by refraining from disparaging the tastes, writing styles or opinions of your fellow users. It is generally best to confine your reviews only to the tobacco in question and not to respond to what others have written previously. While lively arguments about the merits of certain pipe tobaccos can be entertaining to all, this is not the place for them.

  • Pipe Tool for iPhone Now Available (July 15, 2010 at 10:49 AM)

    Back in October of 2009, I mentioned that Tobacco Reviews data would be available as an API. Well, a few folks got in touch with ideas of how to use that API data, and the first one is ready for prime time! Jason Goldman has built an excellent Pipe Tool application for the iPhone and [...]

  • Quick Note For Submitters (July 12, 2010 at 10:50 PM)

    When submitting new tobacco blends to the database, please do not use the Blend Notes section for anything other than historical or geographical information about a tobacco. Particularly, do not attempt to use the Blend Notes to talk about your tobacco shop or local blender. Doing so will get your request deleted summarily. Examples of [...]

  • Reviews Now Paginated (March 10, 2010 at 05:30 PM)

    Wow! You folks sure do write a lot of reviews. That’s awesome. However, showing the sheer number of reviews for some blends is putting a serious strain on the servers and causing a bunch of timeout errors. In the hopes of alleviating the problems I have, reluctantly,  re-enabled the paged view of reviews. I know [...]

  • Regarding HR 4439 (February 01, 2010 at 03:46 PM)

    Do what you can to help stop HR 4439, the so-called Tobacco Tax Parity Act of 2010, which will raise the Federal Excise Tax on pipe tobacco 775%, from $2.8311 to $24.78. This bill, introduced by Rep. Steve Cohen (D, TN) and Lloyd Doggett (D, TX), member of the House Ways and Means Committee, threatens [...]


home back to top

modified plantigrade utube

©2001-2011 Jon Tillman. All rights reserved. Trademarks and copyrights incorporated herein are the exclusive property of the referenced entity. Individual reviews are the opinion(s) of the contributor and probably don't reflect the opinion(s) of Jon Tillman. Published review content of this website is considered the copyright intellectual property of the reviewer and Jon Tillman and may not be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written consent of the reviewer or Jon Tillman.